Every Organization, No Matter Who It Is,

In Entertainment, The Technology Began Giving Us Greater Choice And Easier Switching Before Almost Any Other Area. The Studios Became Much More Dependent On The Stars, Not Just Star Actors And Directors But Also Star Technicians, Star Cinematographers. It's A Very Important Evolution In Terms Of Understanding Why People Are Working The Way They're Working.

Given That Ever-broadening Array Of Options And Alternatives, As Consumers And Investors, We Are Often Bewildered. We Need Guidance. That's Where Today's Brands Come In. They Are Not So Much Signals About A Particular Product, They Are Signals About Good Judgment, Trustworthiness. A Big Brand, Whether It's Schwab Or Disney, Is Becoming Analogous To A Portal That Sells Us Advice About Where We Can Find Great Deals.

Britain's Is Traditionally A Rigid Class Society.

The Core Principle Is That We Want An Economy That Works For Everyone, Not Just For A Small Elite. We Want Equal Opportunity, Not Equality Of Outcome. We Want To Make Sure That There's Upward Mobility Again, In Our Society And In Our Economy.

As To The Meaning Of "corporate Social Responsibility," Friedman And I Would Agree: If A Certain Action Improves The Corporation's Bottom Line, There's No Point In Labeling It "socially Responsible." It's Just Good Business.