What Is Needed Is To Learn Afresh,

And Thought Struggles Against The Results, Trying To Avoid Those Unpleasant Results While Keeping On With That Way Of Thinking. That Is What I Call 'sustained Incoherence.

The Question Of Relevance Comes Before That Of Truth, Because To Ask Whether A Statement Is True Or False Presupposes That It Is Relevant (so That To Try To Assert The Truth Or Falsity Of An Irrelevant Statement Is A Form Of Confusion).

To Change Your Reality You Have To Change Your Inner Thoughts.

The Treatment Of The Indeterminacy Principle As Absolute And Final Can Then Be Criticized As Constituting An Arbitrary Restriction On Scientific Theories, Since It Does Not Follow From The Quantum Theory As Such, But Rather From The Assumption Of The Unlimited Validity Of Certain Of Its Features, An Assumption That Can In No Way Ever Be Subjected To Experimental Proof.

Then There Is The Further Question Of What Is The Relationship Of Thinking To Reality. As Careful Attention Shows, Thought Itself Is In An Actual Process Of Movement.