We Should Start Calling This Law Scotuscare

This Is An Execution, Not Surgery. Where Does That Come From, That You Must Find The Method Of Execution That Causes The Least Pain?

The Purpose Of The Federalist Society Was To Bring Together Young People Who Had This Skepticism About What They Were Being Taught And To Let Them Know That There Were Others Who Shared This Skepticism.

A Journalistic Purpose Could Be Someone With A Xerox Machine In A Basement.

There Is No Basis In Text, Tradition, Or Even In Contemporary Practice (if That Were Enough), For Finding In The Constitution A Right To Demand Judicial Consideration Of Newly Discovered Evidence Of Innocence Brought Forward After Conviction. My Concern Is That In Making Life Easier For Ourselves We Not Appear To Make It Harder For The Lower Federal Courts, Imposing Upon Them The Burden Of Regularly Analyzing Newly-discovered-evidence-of-innocence Claims In Capital Cases (in Which Event Such Federal Claims, It Can Confidently Be Predicted, Will Become Routine And Even Repetitive).

Under All The Usual Rules Of Interpretation, In Short, The Government Should Lose This Case. But Normal Rules Of Interpretation Seem Always To Yield To The Overriding Principle Of The Present Court: The Affordable Care Act Must Be Saved.