Two Important Characteristics Of Maps Should Be

If We, Who Live Outside Asylums, Act As If We Lived In A Fictitious World- That Is To Say, If We Are Consistent With Our Beliefs- We Cannot Adjust Ourselves To Actual Conditions, And So Fall Into Many Avoidable Semantic Difficulties. But The So-called Normal Person Practically Never Abides By His Beliefs, And When His Beliefs Are Building For Him A Fictitious World, He Saves His Neck By Not Abiding By Them. A So-called "insane" Person Acts Upon His Beliefs, And So Cannot Adjust Himself To A World Which Is Quite Different From His Fancy.

Whatever You Say It Is, Is Simply What You Say It Is.

It Is Amusing To Discover, In The Twentieth Century, That The Quarrels Between Two Lovers, Two Mathematicians, Two Nations, Two Economic Systems, Usually Assumed Insoluble In A Finite Period Should Exhibit One Mechanism, The Semantic Mechanism Of Identification - The Discovery Of Which Makes Universal Agreement Possible, In Mathematics And In Life.

It Is A Fallacy Of The Old Schools To Divide Man Into Parcels, Elements, Thoughts, Emotions, Intuitions, Etc. All Human Faculties Consist Of An Interconnected Whole.

Whatever You Might Say The Object "is", Well It Is Not.