The Greatest Danger To The State Is

I Define Anarchist Society As One Where There Is No Legal Possibility For Coercive Aggression Against The Person Or Property Of Any Individual. Anarchists Oppose The State Because It Has Its Very Being In Such Aggression, Namely, The Expropriation Of Private Property Through Taxation, The Coercive Exclusion Of Other Providers Of Defense Service From Its Territory, And All Of The Other Depredations And Coercions That Are Built Upon These Twin Foci Of Invasions Of Individual Rights.

Money Is The General Medium Of Exchange. It Is The Thing For Which All Other Goods Are Traded, The Means Of Final Payment For Such Goods On The Market.

This Process, This Method Necessary To Man's Survival And Prosperity Upon The Earth, Has Often Been Derided As Unduly Or Exclusively "materialistic." But It Should Be Clear That What Has Happened In This Activity Proper To Man's Nature Is A Fusion Of "spirit" And Matter; Man's Mind, Using The Ideas It Has Learned, Directs His Energy In Transforming And Reshaping Matter Into Ways To Sustain And Advance His Wants And His Life. Behind Every "produced" Good, Behind Every Man-made Transformation Of Natural Resources, Is An Idea Directing The Effort, A Manifestation Of Man's Spirit.

The General Theory Was Not Truly Revolutionary At All But Merely Old And Oft-refuted Mercantilist And Inflationist Fallacies Dressed Up In Shiny New Garb, Replete With Newly Constructed And Largely Incomprehensible Jargon.

Once One Concedes That A Single World Government Is Not Necessary, Then Where Does One Logically Stop At The Permissibility Of Separate States? If Canada And The United States Can Be Separate Nations Without Being Denounced As In A State Of Impermissible ‘anarchy’, Why May Not The South Secede From The United States? New York State From The Union? New York City From The State? Why May Not Manhattan Secede? Each Neighbourhood? Each Block? Each House? Each Person?