Obviously Im A Lawyer; I Like To

When You Think Of Napster, You Think Of Music. But The First Thing That Struck Me Was That This Was An Important Case Not Only For The Music Industry But For The Whole Internet.

You Never Know When You Lose A Case Whether It Was Because The Facts Were Against You, Or Because The Judges Had Already Made Up Their Minds, Or If You Could Have Done Something Differently.

We Put Fear And Prejudice On Trial, And Fear And Prejudice Lost.

My Question Is What Non-microsoft Browsers Were You Concerned About In January Of 1996.

Napster's Only Alleged Liability Is For Contributory Or Vicarious Infringement. So When Napster's Users Engage In Noncommercial Sharing Of Music, Is That Activity Copyright Infringement? No.