If Communism Was Liberalism In A Hurry,

The Us Constitution Serves The Same Function As The British Royal Family: It Offers A Comforting Symbol Of Tradition And Continuity, Thereby Masking A Radical Change In The Actual System Of Power.

A Belief In Moral Absolutes Should Always Make Us More, Not Less, Critical Of Both Sides In Any Conflict. This Doesn't Mean That Both Sides Are Equally Wrong; It Means That Since We All Fall Short Of Moral Perfection, Even The Side Whose Cause Is Truly Righteous May Commit Terrible Acts Of Violence In Defense Of That Cause -- And, Worse, May Feel Quite Justified In Committing Them. That Is The Difference Between Being Righteous And Being Self-righteous. Moral Standards Are Absolute; But Human Fidelity To Them Is Always Relative.

Freedom Is Coming To Mean Little More Than The Right To Ask Permission.

Liberals Have A New Wish Every Time Their Latest Wish Is Granted. Conservatives Should Make Them Spell Out Their Principles And Ideals. Instead Of Doing This, Conservatives Allow Liberals To Pursue Incremental Goals Without Revealing Their Ultimate Destination. So, Thanks To The Negligence Of Their Opponents, Liberals Control The Terms Of Every Debate By Always Demanding 'more' While Never Defining 'enough.' The Predictable Result Is That They Always Get More, And It's Never Enough.

What A Blessing 'terrorism' Is For The State! It's The Ideal Distraction From The Day-to-day Reality Of The State's Chief Activity: Wringing From Its Subjects The Wealth They Produce. Last September (2001) A Handful Of Fanatics, Armed Only With Box-cutters, Provided A New Rationale For The Trillion -dollar Swindle. A Bonanza! I Don't Know What These 'terrorists' Thought They Were Achieving: Making The Infidel Respect Allah? If So, They Were Wrong. You Might As Well Try To Make The U.s. Government Respect The U.s. Constitution.