I Have This Embedded Faith In The

You're Always Choosing The Start Point And The End Point. And Almost By Definition, The Most Interesting Period Is Where Something Happens, As A Result Of Which Something Is Different At The End. And So To Me, The Idea That You Know Everything About A Character At The Beginning Is Sort Of Ridiculous. Something Has To Be Revealed. I Like It When The Deeper You Go With The Character, The More You See The Layers Start To Peel Away. It's More Challenging To Me, But It's Also Just Interesting. Those Are The Things I Like To Watch. I Like To Watch The Evolutions Of Something.

A Lot Of Why I Do Something Is Just The Novelty Of The Experience.

There's A Lot Of Romanticisation Of The Intuitive Actor And Method Acting And All Kinds Of Notions About Getting Inside A Character And Coming Out From There.

I Think That The Environmental Movement Is Wisely Moving Away From A Largely Emotion-based Argument For The Spiritual Or Intrinsic Value Of Nature With A Capital "n" And Evolving Toward A Very Hard-nosed Case For The Economic Value Of Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity, Etc.

To Cite My Own Alma Mater, It's Shocking To Me That Yale University Can Teach What It Teaches At The Yale School Of Environmental Studies And Utterly Fail To Mirror Those Values In Any Way In Its Investment Practices.