A Defeated Argument That Refuses To Be

Women Had Always Been Thought Of As Looking After The Family When Men Go And Earn An Income And They're The Bread Earner And So On. So There Is A Kind Of Generation Of Inequality, [and], On Top Of The Fact, Women Have Pregnancies And Periods, [and] When The Children Are Very Small, There Are Greater Demands On Their Time. So One Way Or Another Women Have Had A Pretty Rough Deal In The Past, And There's No Reason Why That Should Continue, And Any Country That Has Tried To Remedy That Has Succeeded In Doing So.

I Think In Those Countries, Including My Own In India, Where I Think Primary Education Has Been Badly Neglected By Successive Governments, I Blame The Opposition As Much. Why Have They Allowed The Government To Get Away With It?

The Success Of A Society Is To Be Evaluated Primarily By The Freedoms That Members Of The Society Enjoy.

It’s Very Easy To Capture Pictures Of Jubilant People In The Street After The Nuclear Bomb. But There Were No Pictures Of Morose People Sitting In Their Kitchens And Living Rooms.

Famines Are Easy To Prevent If There Is A Serious Effort To Do So, And A Democratic Government, Facing Elections And Criticisms From Opposition Parties And Independent Newspapers, Cannot Help But Make Such An Effort. Not Surprisingly, While India Continued To Have Famines Under British Rule Right Up To Independence... They Disappeared Suddenly With The Establishment Of A Multiparty Democracy And... A Free Press And An Active Political Opposition Constitute The Best Early-warning System A Country Threaten By Famines Can Have.